No Evidence Against Assemblyman William Baah in Major Mahama Case

## **No Evidence Against Assemblyman William Baah in Major Mahama Case 

On Friday, 21st November 2025, a significant twist emerged in the long-running Major Mahama murder trial. According to a report highlighted by Lawson TV, lawyers for Assemblyman **William Baah** have asserted that **there is no evidence linking him to the lynching** of the late Major Maxwell Mahama — a claim that immediately sparked public debate and renewed attention on the case.

### **Background: A Case That Shocked a Nation**

The tragic death of Major Maxwell Mahama in 2017 remains one of the most emotionally charged events in Ghana’s recent history. What began as a misunderstanding escalated into a brutal mob action that led to nationwide condemnation and widespread calls for justice.

Over the years, the trial has involved multiple suspects, with the Assemblyman of Denkyira-Obuasi, William Baah, frequently appearing at the center of public discussion due to allegations that he may have influenced or encouraged the mob.

### **What the Lawyer Is Saying**

In the latest development, Baah’s lawyer claims that **there is no direct or substantive evidence** connecting him to the events that led to Major Mahama’s death. According to the report, the defense argues that:

* The Assemblyman **did not incite the mob**.

* There is **no proof** that he ordered or participated in the attack.

* Allegations against him are based on **assumptions rather than verified facts**.

While these claims come from the defense, they mark a notable turn in how the case is being publicly framed.

### **Why This Update Matters**

This announcement raises important questions:

1. **Does this shift the direction of the prosecution’s arguments?**

   If indeed there is no concrete evidence, it could reshape the court’s approach to Baah’s charges.

2. **What does this mean for the broader pursuit of justice?**

   Ghanaians have long awaited closure on this case. Any new claims — especially those challenging previously held beliefs — will naturally evoke strong reactions.

3. **How will the public respond?**

   With social media already buzzing, this development may further divide public opinion on the Assemblyman’s role.

### **The Road Ahead**

While the lawyer’s statement is significant, the final judgment rests solely with the court. As proceedings continue, Ghanaians will be watching closely to see what evidence the prosecution presents, how the defense counters it, and ultimately how the judiciary brings closure to one of the country’s most painful episodes.

For now, what’s clear is that the narrative around the case is evolving — and this latest claim adds yet another layer to an already complex pursuit of Justice